Newer
Older
NuttX TODO List (Last updated December 20, 2012)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This file summarizes known NuttX bugs, limitations, inconsistencies with
standards, things that could be improved, and ideas for enhancements.
(1) Memory Managment (mm/)
patacongo
committed
(2) pthreads (sched/)
(6) Binary loaders (binfmt/)
(17) Network (net/, drivers/net)
(4) USB (drivers/usbdev, drivers/usbhost)
(12) Libraries (libc/, )
patacongo
committed
(9) File system/Generic drivers (fs/, drivers/)
(5) Graphics subystem (graphics/)
(5) Linux/Cywgin simulation (arch/sim)
patacongo
committed
(6) ARM (arch/arm/)
(2) ARM/i.MX (arch/arm/src/imx/)
(7) ARM/LPC214x (arch/arm/src/lpc214x/)
(0) ARM/LPC43x (arch/arm/src/lpc43xx/)
(3) ARM/LM3S6918 (arch/arm/src/lm3s/)
(4) ARM/STM32 (arch/arm/src/stm32/)
(5) 8051 / MCS51 (arch/8051/)
(1) Hitachi/Renesas SH-1 (arch/sh/src/sh1)
(9) z16 (arch/z16/)
apps/
(5) Network Utilities (apps/netutils/)
(1) System libraries apps/system (apps/system)
(5) Other Applications & Tests (apps/examples/)
Title: CHILD PTHREAD TERMINATION
Description: When a tasks exits, shouldn't all of its child pthreads also be
terminated?
Status: Closed. No, this behavior will not be implemented.
Priority: Medium, required for good emulation of process/pthread model.
Description: Implement sys/wait.h and functions. Consider implementing wait,
waitpid, waitid. At present, a parent has no information about
child tasks.
Update: A simple but usable version of waitpid() has been included.
This version is not compliant with all specifications and can be
enabled with CONFIG_SCHED_WAITPID.
Status: Open, however no further work is planned.
Update: These are being fixed as they are encountered. There is
no accounting of how many interfaces have this problem.
Status: Open? There has been an effort over the past few years to assure
that all errno settings are in place. What is the current state?
Unknown.
Priority: Medium, required for standard compliance (but makes the
code bigger)
Title: TICKLESS OS
Description: On a side note, I have thought about a tick-less timer for the OS
for a long time. Basically we could replace the periodic system
timer interrupt with a one-shot interval timer programmed for the
next interesting event time. That is one way to both reduce the
timer interrupt overhead and also to increase the accuracy of
delays.
Current timer processing is in sched/sched_processtimer.c:
1) Calls clock_timer() which just increments a counter (the system
timer -- basically "up-time"). This is only used when code asks
for the current time. In a tickless OS, some substitute answer
for the question "What time is it?" would need to be developed.
You could use an RTC? Or maybe logic that gets the time until the
next interval expiration and computes the current time. The
solution is not too difficult, but depends on a hardware solution.
2) Calls wd_timer() which handles the link list of ordered events:
Each timer event is saved with the delta time to the next event
in the list. So an interval timer would be perfect to implement this.
3) sched_process_timeslice(). Then there is round-robin time-slicing.
The primary advantage of a tickless OS is that is would allow for
reduce power consumptions. That is because timer interrupts will
usually awaken CPUs from reduced power consumption states.
Status: Open. There will probably be no tickless OS implementation unless
someone gets motivated and drives the change.
Title: posix_spawn()
Description: This would be a good interface to add to NuttX. It is really
just a re-packaging of the existing, non-standard NuttX exec()
function.
Status: Open. There are no plans to implement this capabilitiey now.
Title: pause() NON-COMPLIANCE
Description: In the POSIX description of this function is the pause() function
will suspend the calling thread until delivery of a signal whose
action is either to execute a signal-catching function or to
terminate the process. The current implementation only waits for
any non-blocked signal to be received. It should only wake up if
the signal is delivered to a handler.
Status: Open.
Priority: Medium Low.
Title: ON-DEMAND PAGE INCOMPLETE
Description: On-demand paging has recently been incorporated into the RTOS.
The design of this feature is described here:
http://www.nuttx.org/NuttXDemandPaging.html.
As of this writing, the basic feature implementation is
complete and much of the logic has been verified. The test
harness for the feature exists only for the NXP LPC3131 (see
configs/ea3131/pgnsh and locked directories). There are
some limitations of this testing so I still cannot say that
the feature is fully functional.
Status: Open. This has been put on the shelf for some time.
Description: get_environ_ptr() (sched/sched_getenvironptr.c) is not implemented.
The representation of the the environment strings selected for
NutX is not compatible with the operation. Some significant
re-design would be required to implement this funcion and that
effort is thought to be not worth the result.
Description: timer_getoverrun() (sched/timer_getoverrun.c) is not implemented.
Status: Open
Priority: Low -- There is no plan to implement this.
Title: USER-SPACE WORK QUEUES
Description: There has been some use of work queues that has crept into some
user code. I am thinking of NxWidgets::CNxTimer. That timer
logic was originally implemented (correctly) using POSIX timers,
but was re-implemented using timed work.
The issue is that NxWidgets::CNxTimer is a user-space application
but the work queues are an OS internal feature. This will be a
problem for KERNEL builds. Hooks and definitions have been added
in include/nuttx/wqueue.h to support a user-space work queue, but
the corresponding logic has not been implemented.
The work queue logic will need to be moved from sched/ to libc/wqueue/
Status: Open. No work will probably be done until a functional KERNEL build
that includes NxWisges::CNxTimer is needed.
Priority: Medium Low for now
Title: FREE MEMORY ON TASK EXIT
Description: Add an option to free all memory allocated by a task when the
task exits. This is probably not be worth the overhead for a
deeply embedded system.
There would be complexities with this implementation as well
because often one task allocates memory and then passes the
memory to another: The task that "owns" the memory may not
be the same as the task that allocated the memory.
Update. From the NuttX forum:
...there is a good reason why task A should never delete task B.
That is because you will strand memory resources. Another feature
lacking in most flat address space RTOSs is automatic memory
clean-up when a task exits.
That behavior just comes for free in a process-based OS like Linux:
Each process has its own heap and when you tear down the process
environment, you naturally destroy the heap too.
But RTOSs have only a single, shared heap. I have spent some time
thinking about how you could clean up memory required by a task
when a task exits. It is not so simple. It is not as simple as
just keeping memory allocated by a thread in a list then freeing
Loading
Loading full blame...